Saturday, March 9, 2019
Authoritarian Government for the Philippines
Closing Government, Rebuttal enquiry Motion This house believes that an undemocratic politics will help the Philippines progress. I. expect Argument The trunk of government doesnt matter and the progress of the dry land will depend on the kind of attractor we fork emerge as a prexy. II. Counter-Argument Unlike in other forms of the government, the authoritarian form of government allows us to set a criterion to what kind of leader is better for our coarse. III. ExplanationSince the authoritarian government aims for a person single-handedly stellar(a) our country, all citizens must adhere and go by the ideals set by the leader himself. The only time the country will be in chaos during an authoritarian regime is when the citizens dont agree with the leader. This sens be solved by a very strict criteria and standard of what kind of leader our death chair should be. The standards plenty be ranged from what kind of give lessons he graduated from, to experiences in lead ership.Being a leader of a country is not simply a face who everybody recognizes from television or somebody who bribes and cheats his way into gravel. Setting a standard is faster and more than possible when we have an authoritarian government. Other governments have to be associated and conjugate with freedom, and so it is r bely possible to set a particular proposition standard for electing a president because they promote independence and freedom of whomever wants to be a president.It is most likely that there could be an unsuitable leader that is elected to be president in a democratic form of government (because it is everybodys ball game, quoted from my father) that is the reason why until now, Filipinos are still pro analyseing about our presidents and how they do not do anything to solve our problems. When we have a proper judgement of who to elect leader, we can have a more disciplined nation, economy follows right after because when we have a leader with unity single vision to improve on our problems, the processes can be faster.The standard set can reflect how much our president can help us with our economy. Stocks can go higher, we can exporting more high priority local goods, and we can improve on our nationalism at the same time. We have to put our electoral nominees to the test so that we can have a more progressive country in terms of economy. IV. Examples In a smaller scale, the application of an authoritarian government can be associated with how one runs a company with the president as the chief operating officer, and the opposite local governments in our country as the different departments in an office building.In a publicly owned company, the chief operating officer must be a good role model to his employees in order to make them do their job properly. The CEO must yield the needs of the employees and in turn, the employees give their hard work and talent in their business. Trust is therefore developed and it makes running the bu siness flow easily. When mess choose a CEO, they do not just choose out of a whim. They pick people who are trained specially for the position and they have a road map on who to assign the position of CEO or any other big name in a company.Effective CEOs are those who amidst crisis, can still maintain the stock prices and make them the same amount as every normal day. However, when they appoint a bad CEO, it can be seen when the stocks drop low for about 40 to 50% even when there is no serious problem. In that case, he should really be ousted. Singapore, having an authoritarian government led by undercoat Minister Lee Hsien Loong, has an economy relatively corruption free and has one of the highest GDPs (Gross Domestic Products) in the world.It would not have been possible to have such a successful economy if not for such a fitted Prime Minister for their country. I believe that it is possible for it to happen in our country, the Philippines, as long as we have a specific guidel ine and criteria in nomitating and electing our countrys leader. V. Sources 1) Country Rankings. (accessed January 20, 2012) http//www. heritage. org/index/Ranking. aspx 2) Huff, W. G. Cambridge Journal of Economics. (accessed January 23, 2012) http//cje. oxfordjournals. org/ study/19/6/735. abstract
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment